NCPERS
Calls Plan to Privatize California Pension System "Dumb" The measure, Assembly Constitutional
Amendment 5, by Assemblyman Keith Richman (R-Northridge) would eventually
scrap Californias $177 billion Public Employee Retirement System
(CalPERS), as well as 20 independent county retirement systems and the
California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS). In its place
would be a 401K-style defined contributionEsystem, run by private,
for-profit investment managers. Under ACA5, new employees would be
required to have the defined contribution system beginning in
2007. NCPERS' executive board, meeting on
December 4, declared its total opposition to this constitutional amendment
and committed NCPERS' resources to fight this effort to destroy the
retirement plans of millions of California public employees. "It
doesn't make sense to scrap a good defined benefit plan and replace it
with individual defined contribution plans that would make public
employees' pensions subject to the ups and downs of the stock market,"
stated NCPERS President Robert Podgorny. In the end, California
taxpayers would see costs rise, public services deteriorate and new
pressure on state and local governments to provide safety nets for these
workers. NCPERS is committed to fighting this amendment and those
who support such a change in order to reap financial benefits at the
expense of public employees. NCPERS joined with other state and
local officials in a press conference briefing on this issue on Friday,
December 3, prior to the introduction of ACA5. Longer term, switching to a privatized
system will cost the state $18 billion in CalPERS investment out of
Californias economy. It will also cost the state influence in the
nations financial community Eas the largest and third-largest pension
funds, CalPERS and CalSTRS carry tremendous leverage to hold corporate
CEOs accountable to their shareholders. The proposal could also dramatically
increase the pressure on Californias fragile safety net, as employees
outlive their retirement benefits or, worse, neglect to save at all.
Assemblymen Richman has indicated that
if he fails to get a constitutional amendment approved by the assemby in
time for the 2006 ballot, he will go the initiative route and get it
placed on the 2006 ballot. The California Professional
Firefighters (CPF) has prepared some background materials on the issue and
these can be viewed by clicking here. Stay tuned for more update and
information on this issue that affects not only California, but the nation
as well. |